The Trump administration came once again to the Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon and asked the justices to pause an order by a federal court in Massachusetts that would require […]

In remarks before judges and lawyers in California, the justice said she believed the court had a responsibility to share its reasoning.

The decision from a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals argued Trump's order seeking to end birthright citizenship is unconstitutional.

The justices paused a lower court order pending a decision on whether the Supreme Court will take up the case, a major challenge to the Voting Rights Act.

The president's reading of the 14th Amendment is contradicted by its text and history, plus 127 years of Supreme Court precedent.

The United States Federal Courthouse in Austin on June 9, 2023. (Joe Timmerman/The Texas Tribune, ... These legal fights, which can escalate all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, ...

By Andrew Chung (Reuters) -Even as an uproar over files relating to Jeffrey Epstein engulfs President Donald Trump and Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court is due to wade into the controversy and decide whether to hear a bid by an associate of the late financier and convicted sex offender to overturn her criminal conviction.